Monday, April 7, 2008

Abortion and Database Censorship

Score one for list-serv journalism. Looks like the folks over at SLA-DBIO and MEDLIB-L uncovered a major case of censorship. The Popline database, which Johns Hopkins University maintains for the U.S. government, was reconfigured some time in the past few weeks so that searches of the term "abortion" yielded no results.

The official explanation from the database managers: "We recently made all abortion terms stop words. As a federally funded project, we decided this was best for now."

The news quickly swirled around the blogosophere and then on to the traditional media, which is still how most of us learned about it, I bet.

In response, Johns Hopkins decided to reinstate "abortion" as a search term in the Popline database. Very 1984.

Thursday, April 3, 2008

Gorman to Speak at Weatherhead Seminar

Adil Najam, Phil Hilts and I will be co-panelists on Tuesday, April 8 from 4-6 pm at Harvard's Weatherhead Center. Our topic is "Rethinking the United States Behavior in the World: The Role of Global Health." The address is 1737 Cambridge Street, Room N-262.

Najam is an associate professor of international negotiation and diplomacy at Tufts.

Hilts is the incoming director of the Knight Science Journalism Fellowships at MIT.

Here's the official Weatherhead post about the seminar.

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Gapminder, Worker Safety, Pandemic Absenteeism

Visualize This! The INFO Project notes that Gapminder is now available through Google Spreadsheets.

Workplace Safety. Over at the Pump Handle, Celeste Monforton is "ready to start a petition drive to bring Jerry Scannell back as the head of OSHA in the next (D) or (R) Administration!"

No-shows. Revere looks at new laws that would penalize health care workers who refuse to show up at work during a pandemic.

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Cell Phone Journalism in Zimbabwe

Another example of how cell phones and text messaging are transforming public discourse and civic engagement.

AfricaFocus reports that "a late change in [Zimbabwe's] electoral law had resulted in the public posting of results in constituencies around the country, and that this had made it possible for unofficial counts to speed around the country by text message, email, and mobile phones."

And now the New York Times is reporting that Mugabe may be on his way out.

Related stories:
How Not to Repair Zimbabwe's Health Care System
Radio Plus Cell Phones Beat Low-Cost Laptops

Monday, March 31, 2008

Looking Ahead: How Not to Repair Zimbabwe's Health Care System

My friend and fellow Nieman fellow Andrew Meldrum has an article about the deteriorated health care system in Zimbabwe in this week's Lancet. The full text is completely available (after free registration) and well worth reading. The core message, for me, is looking forward to a post-Mugabe future (keep your fingers crossed on the election results).

Meldrum, who was kicked out of Zimbabwe by the Mugabe government in 2003, warns about the unintended consequences of too much aid too fast:

Those who know Zimbabwe and its people have no doubt that it will rise phoenix-like from the ashes of the current crisis. To do so rapidly will require massive external support. There is already talk of a Zimbabwean rescue package, with assurances of millions of dollars of emergency aid awaiting an acceptable resolution of the political crisis. But health-care officials warn of the destructive capacity of a sudden surfeit of funds. Especially, there is a fear that any new political dispensation may surrender Zimbabwe's hard-won ownership of its development programme to the agenda of a well funded international donor agency.


Related story:
Are Donors Promoting Corruption in Malawi?

Here Come the Participatory Media

Persephone Miel at the Berkman Center tells me that the new buzz phrase for citizen journalism is participatory media. As I understand it, the idea is to evoke more of the collaboration between folks with various levels of expertise that is possible on the Internet--as opposed to some probably overdrawn caricature of the "pajamas media."

Miel is not so sure that the folks formerly known as citizen journalists are truly up to the task of covering the news. But then again, maybe neither are traditional journalists, as she writes on the Media Re:public blog about the incredibly shrinking shape of news.

Meanwhile, the City of New York subpoenaed the creator of Txtmob, which is a text-messaging service that many demonstrators used to coordinate efforts during the 2004 Republican Convention in New York City. What does that have to do with global health? Know any humanitarian relief organizations that rely on text messaging to coordinate efforts on the ground? The solid citizens of the global health community are not so unrelated to the fringe as they might think.

Are Donors Promoting Corruption in Malawi?

As larger amounts of money flow into global health, greater attention must be paid to tracking where the cash flows in both poor and rich countries. Although Globalintegrity.org doesn't focus on global health per se, it provides an intriguing model for how that task might be accomplished.

I was in Washington, DC last week with my fellow Nieman global health fellows. Had drinks at the Mayflower Hotel with Charles Lewis, one of the co-founders of the Center for Public Integrity. (No sign of disgraced New York governor Elliot Spitzer).

It was great to hear how enthusiastic Lewis is about the prospects for non-profit investigative reporting. Also learned about a more recent project he had a hand in shaping--an outfit called Global Integrity--that Lewis says is giving Transparency International a run for its money.

Global Integrity, according to its website, is "an independent, non-profit organization tracking governance and corruption trends around the world. [The organization] works with local teams of researchers and journalists to monitor openness and accountability."

What most impressed me was how they are able to pull together official data from the World Bank, UN Development Program as well as local groups and non-government agencies. They are, in essence, creating a database of corruption indicators that draws on the full range of local as well as international inputs.

The result is an incredibly useful blend of qualitative and quantitative data. Individual country reports are concise and mercifully devoid of jargon--like the one on Malawi written by journalist Suzanne Marmion.

While the whole Malawi report is well-worth reading (it will take you maybe three minutes), there's one part that really made me sit up and take notice. Marmion writes:

When it comes to corruption, foreign donors are increasingly a part of the problem. Many donors show "results" by how much they have managed to spend in a country, not necessarily by how many people have benefited from the help. Inadvertently, this spending sets up an environment for corruption by providing incentives for simply using up money without showing any positive outcomes. Money either doesn't get spent or winds up being used to pay for expensive hotels and redundant workshops in a rush to use up funds by the end of the fiscal year.

Approximately three quarters of the government's income comes from foreign aid. The senior Malawian official in the Accountant General's office says that unlike government money, which is now centrally tracked, money donated to various public officials is not monitored. Nobody tracks which donor has paid whom, and for what.

Asked whether Malawi's problem is due more to corruption than to dysfunction, [David] Gilmour [the outgoing U.S. deputy chief of mission to Malawi] laughs and says, "No, unfortunately there's plenty of both."

And while the Malawian government today is trying to starve its corrupt members, a Malawian official says, "Now they're just eating from donors."

Sunday, March 30, 2008

New Design for Global Health Report

Signs of spring: crocuses, longer days and a new design for my Global Health blog. This one is called Tic Tac Blue. The old one was Denim.

Oh yeah. I've added some global health videos from YouTube in the right-hand column. Let me know what you think.

Nurses, Water, Toxic Chemicals in Iraq

Headlines that have caught my attention:

More Nurses Leaving UK for Australia "The Australian recruitment drive comes as the number of foreign nurses seeking work in the UK is falling." (BBC)

Water Utility in Malawi's Largest City At A Breaking Point ". . . access to [safe drinking] water has improved significantly [in Malawi] , from slightly over 47 percent in 1992 to 75 percent in 2006. But the state of affairs in Blantyre could overshadow this achievement." (allafrica.com)

Iraq contractor Fights Suit Over Toxic Exposure "When the American team arrived in Iraq in the summer of 2003 to repair the Qarmat Ali water injection plant, supervisors told them the orange, sand-like substance strewn around the looted facility was just a "mild irritant," workers recall. . . . But the chemical turned out to be sodium dichromate, a substance so dangerous that even limited exposure greatly increases the risk of cancer." (Boston Globe)

Monday, March 24, 2008

Dangerous Chinese Factories: The Woman Behind the Story

If Loretta Tofani were a better businesswoman, we might never have learned just how incredibly unsafe working conditions are in the many Chinese factories that export furniture and other goods to the United States.

Tofani talked about her extraordinary odyssey at the Goldsmith investigative reporting seminar at Harvard's Kennedy School on Wednesday, March 19, 2008. The newspaper series she wrote--"American Imports, Chinese Deaths"--was a finalist for the Goldsmith Awards, whose recipients often go on to receive Pulitzer Prizes. The articles ran in the fall of 2007 in the Salt Lake Tribune.

When Tofani and her husband, a family physician, moved to Utah a few years ago, she gave up journalism to start a furniture importing business. (Tofani had been a longtime investigative reporter at the Philadelphia Inquirer.) In the course of setting up shop, she visited a lot of Chinese factories to see who she might tap as suppliers.

Tofani couldn't help noticing that the workers who sprayed oil-based paint on the assembled furniture lacked even the most basic protection to guard against breathing in the fumes--fumes that she suspected were full of lead.

And this wasn't happening in just a few odd factories. As a businesswoman, Tofani had access to many more places than she would have had as a journalist. In factory after factory, she kept noticing workers without protective masks and heard gruesome stories about workers who had lost fingers, hands and arms to dangerous machinery.

Eventually Tofani closed her business and devoted the next couple of years of her life to documenting the extent of the problem in China. And then, she started linking individual factories with poor safety records to the specific American businesses that imported their products.

Listening to Tofani tell her story, I realized how hard freelance investigative reporting is. She worked alone, with a few grants to cover some travel expenses. After her piece ran, she was offered a job with the Salt Lake Tribune but turned it down. She said the newspaper wanted her to turn around her investigative pieces in five weeks and she thought that wasn't enough time.

Paul Steiger, formerly of the Wall Street Journal, was also at the Goldman seminar. He publically offered Tofani a job at ProPublica, his new non-profit investigative news venture--but only if she'd move to New York City. (Note to self: ProPublica's New York-centric newsroom model would make a good subject for another post.)

Made me wonder just who's going to pay for investigative pieces like Tofani's? And what's the cost if we don't hear those stories? If for-profits and non-profits don't do it, are crowd-sourcing and crowd-funding up to the job?

And what about all those other business people who visit Chinese factories? Don't they notice how bad conditions are?

Read Tofani's own account: "How I got the story."